What Reviewers Look For in the CASPA AI and Technology Essay — PA
This rubric looks at how you would use technology with clinical judgment, learn and evaluate it responsibly, and protect patient understanding and choice. It also looks for a realistic plan when technology is unavailable or does not fit a patient's needs, so your response shows that care remains human-centered and workable.
CASPA AI and Technology Essay — PA review
Free Quick Review for feedback. Full Review adds the 4 rubric scores and revision suggestions — first one $5.
2 free Quick Reviews each day · $50 for 10 Full Reviews
What We Check
Whether the response states and applies a decision rule for when emerging technology should support, complicate, be verified, be escalated, or not control care.
Whether future PAs are given an observable method to learn, test, monitor, and escalate technology use rather than a generic promise to stay current.
Whether technology use includes a concrete behavior that preserves patient understanding, choice, privacy, voice, or trust.
Whether a named access constraint changes the proposed action and produces a workable low-tech, no-tech, or differently supported care path.
Mistakes We Flag
- Treating technology as automatically good
- Saying that AI or other tools are simply the future does not explain how you would decide when to use, verify, escalate, or decline a tool in care.
- Listing tools without showing a decision
- Naming AI, telemedicine, and wearables is not enough. Focus on how one tool or type of tool works, its risks, and what you would do in response.
- Promising to stay current without a method
- A general commitment to continuing education does not show how you would learn safely. Explain an action such as supervised practice, evidence review, simulation, patient feedback, or outcome monitoring.
- Calling care human-centered without describing patient actions
- Statements about empathy or trust need a concrete behavior. Show what you would ask, explain, disclose, verify, or change to preserve the patient's voice and choices.
- Adding access concerns only at the end
- A patient’s cost, broadband, language, disability, literacy, maintenance, or workflow barrier should change the care plan. Include a workable low-tech or no-tech path with follow-up and accountability.
How this rubric reads your essay
- Built from published reader guidance — the sources are listed below.
- Scored per section against defined criteria, not general impressions.
- Calibrated for consistent scoring, so a better draft shows up in the score.
References
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to discuss AI, telemedicine, and wearable devices?
No. They are examples, not a required checklist. You can focus on one tool or use a decision rule that applies across technologies.
Do I need a personal clinical experience?
No. Lived, studied, and clearly hypothetical scenarios can all support your response.
What should I show about using technology safely?
Explain how a future PA would learn, test, monitor, and escalate technology use through approaches such as supervised practice, evidence appraisal, simulation, failure testing, patient feedback, or outcome monitoring.
How should I address limited access to technology?
Name a specific barrier, ask what the patient can and wants to use, and provide a workable alternative that maintains the same clinical goal, follow-up, and accountability.
Read the methodology behind this rubric
How Readers Evaluate the CASPA AI and Technology Essay →Get AI feedback on your essay with a free Quick Review. A Full Review adds the 4 rubric scores and revision suggestions — first one $5. Follow your program’s current writing instructions and assistance policies.
See how caspa ai essay review works