Skip to main content
Psychology Internship (AAPI)

What Reviewers Look For in the AAPI Psychology Internship Essays

This rubric reviews whether each response answers its own prompt with clear, specific evidence about your experiences, clinical thinking, diversity-related practice, research, and professional conduct. It also looks at whether your answers work together, protect client privacy, and stay clear, organized, and complete. The goal is to help readers understand what you did, how you think, and how your experiences inform your work.

7 scored dimensionsScore range: 05

What We Check

1
Answering the Actual Question

Whether each submitted answer completes the jobs its own question asks for.

2
Experience That Changes Your Understanding

Whether personal or professional experience supports an interpretation rather than merely recording a biography.

3
Reasoning Behind Clinical Choices

Whether clinical choices follow from an explained understanding of the problem.

4
Context That Changes Clinical Practice

Whether social and cultural context changes a clinical interpretation or response.

5
Research Contribution and Next Questions

Whether research experience explains what the writer did and what inquiry it supports next.

6
Confidentiality and Professional Conduct

Whether the writing protects other people’s privacy and describes professional conduct without endorsing deception or exploitation.

7
Different Answers Add Different Evidence

Whether submitted answers add different information without contradicting one another.

Mistakes We Flag

Turning the autobiography into a CV timeline
Listing roles without explaining what an experience changed in your understanding gives the reader little insight into you.
Naming a therapy approach without showing how you use it
An orientation label or a list of techniques does not explain how you choose an intervention or what process you expect it to affect.
Listing identities without connecting them to practice
A diversity response needs to show how social, cultural, economic, access, or power-related context shaped your clinical understanding or response.
Leaving identifying details in a case example
Names, contact details, or a rare event paired with a location can expose a client even when initials are used.
Repeating the same material without a new purpose
You may reuse an experience or case, but each response should make a distinct point and remain consistent with your other answers.

How this rubric reads your essay

  • Built from published reader guidance — the sources are listed below.
  • Scored per section against defined criteria, not general impressions.
  • Calibrated for consistent scoring, so a better draft shows up in the score.
How the scoring works →

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need four completely different life stories?

No. You may reuse a case or recurring theme when each answer makes a different argument and adds different information.

Do I need to include a client case in my theoretical orientation response?

No. You can explain your orientation through a formulation-and-decision account without using an actual case.

What can count as diversity-related context?

Socioeconomic position, access barriers, and institutional power can be relevant when you connect them to your clinical reasoning. You do not need an extra identity label or group difference.

How long can each AAPI essay be?

Each AAPI essay is limited to 500 words unless a supplied current official prompt gives a different limit. The limit applies to each answer separately, not across all answers combined.

Get AI feedback on your own internship writing with a free Quick Review. Full Reviews add rubric scores and revision suggestions. Remove client-identifying details before submitting; this review does not certify confidentiality or predict a match.