Skip to main content

Supervisor Said Yes: Next Steps in Canada

A Canadian professor agreed to supervise you. What UofT MIE, uOttawa, McGill and Montréal need on file, how to ask about funding, and what to write next.

Nirmal Thacker, Founder, GradPilot · CS, Georgia TechOctober 31, 202611 min read
Free letter of intent reviewRubric-based feedback before you submit
Start

Supervisor Said Yes: Next Steps in Canada

A professor's yes is not an admission. In Canadian programs that need a supervisor, the yes counts only when it becomes the specific thing the program asks for: a confirmation to the Graduate Office at UofT MIE, a signed Approval of Supervisor form at uOttawa Health Sciences, a Supervisor Confirmation Form at McGill Physiology, an approved study plan at Université de Montréal. Do that within days, then ask about funding in one plain question.

This page covers the step between the reply and the offer. It is where a Canadian application can stall: the applicant has a warm email, the program has nothing on file, and the deadline passes.

Every university page quoted below was checked on October 31, 2026. Most of these pages state no cycle year; we flag where they do.

Three kinds of reply and what each one means

Constructed examples, written by us, not real professors' emails.

Reply A: "Thanks. Could you send your CV and transcript?"

Reply B: "Your project fits my group. Please apply and list me as a potential supervisor."

Reply C: "I am willing to supervise you, and I will support your application."

ReplyWhat it meansWhat to do within two working days
A: send documentsScreening. No decision yetSend exactly what was asked, as PDFs, in the same thread
B: apply and list meInterest. In a committee-admission program this may be all you needApply, name the professor where the form asks, and say in your statement that you have been in contact
C: I will support youA yes, in a program that may need it in writingAsk what the program needs from them, then make sure it reaches the program

Reply B and Reply C mean very different things depending on the program. Where a committee admits, Reply B is a useful signal and nothing more. Where admission depends on a supervisor, only Reply C can become an admission, and only once it is on file. Which kind of program you are applying to is set out in do you need a supervisor to apply in Canada. For replies to PhD emails outside Canada, see what to do when a professor replies to your PhD email.

Turn the yes into what the program counts

ProgramWhat the program countsWho sends it
UofT Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, MASc"Confirmation from the supervisor to the Graduate Office is required to proceed in the MASc program."The supervisor
uOttawa Health Sciences, thesis programs that require itThe signed Approval of Supervisor form, uploaded as a PDF through uoZone (uoDoc)You, after the supervisor signs
McGill PhysiologyThe Supervisor Confirmation Form, under Supporting DocumentsYou; if it comes after you submit, you contact the Graduate Program Coordinator
Université de Montréal, maîtrise en sciences de la réadaptation"Le formulaire de plan d'études, décrivant le cheminement et le financement prévus, dûment approuvé par le directeur de recherche."You, with the director's approval
Concordia Art History, PhDA letter of support from the proposed supervisor, "sent as a PDF directly to the student and is then uploaded"The supervisor writes it; you upload it

Three practical points follow from that table.

Ask the professor what they will send, and when. At UofT MIE the supervisor writes to the Graduate Office. At uOttawa and McGill Physiology you upload a form. If you do not ask, both of you may assume the other has done it.

Watch the confirmation deadline, not only the application deadline. McGill Physiology sets a separate "Final recommendation deadline with Supervisor Confirmation": for September admission, March 1 for international students and July 10 for Canadians and permanent residents. The page states no year.

In Montréal, the study plan is about money as well as research. The réadaptation program's plan d'études describes "le cheminement et le financement prévus" (the planned path and funding), and its research-topic form asks how the project fits the director's program "en termes de faisabilité, de financement". A yes in that program is also a funding conversation, whether or not you start it.

Some programs ask you to list several supervisors even when one has said yes. McGill Computer Science PhD applicants "must list at least 3 proposed supervisors", and Queen's Psychology lets applicants rank up to three faculty members. List the professor who said yes first, and fill the other places with real fits, not filler.

Is a "letter of support" something you need?

Only where the program asks for one. Concordia Art History is a clean contrast: the PhD requires "A letter of support from the applicant's proposed supervisor at Concordia University", and the MA page says "A letter of support from the applicant's proposed supervisor at Concordia University is not required."

Our view: do not ask a professor for a letter the program did not request. Ask instead what the program needs from them, and whether they want to be named on your form. A second letter that no reviewer asked for adds work for them and nothing to your file.

The countercase: where admission turns on a supervisor who can fund you, a short written confirmation protects you even when the program does not ask for it on paper. Dalhousie's computational biology MSc says "The applicant must have an identified supervisor who is willing and able to fund them." A one-line email from the professor confirming both is worth keeping, even if you never upload it.

Asking about funding without sounding transactional

In several Canadian programs the supervisor's yes and your funding are the same decision; UofT MIE's funding rule is quoted in do you need a supervisor to apply in Canada. McGill Physiology says: "Financial support is a form of a stipend from the supervisor's research grant or a fellowship held by the student."

International applicants should ask early. Queen's Psychology's availability list has a column for "faculty availability to take in international students for Fall 2027", and says faculty marked NO "may also consider international students that are funded by external funding, including government funding."

Our recommendation: ask once, in writing, within a week of the yes, in a question that can be answered with facts.

Constructed example, written by us, not a real applicant's email.

Thank you for agreeing to supervise my MASc application. Before I complete the forms, could you tell me whether the position would be funded, and if so through which sources (research assistantship, teaching assistantship or a department award) and for how many years? I also hold a [name] scholarship from my home government for [amount] per year, if that affects the plan.

That is 62 words (our count). It asks for the source and the duration, not a promise. It also states external funding up front, which McGill's central guidance asks applicants to do: "If you already have funding, state the amount, duration and source."

Read the answer against the offer letter later, line by line, because a package can include money that goes straight back to tuition; what a Canadian MASc funding package covers shows how to check. If the professor prefers a call, questions for a MASc supervisor interview in Canada covers what to ask before you hang up. For negotiating an offer you already hold, see negotiating PhD funding.

What to write in the statement once you have a yes

Canadian departments ask you to report contact, and some say how.

  • Dalhousie History: "If you have already been in contact with a potential supervisor from our department, include that information in your Statement."
  • McGill Physiology: "Indicate to whom any contact has been made as well as areas of research interest."
  • Concordia Art History MA: "if you have already spoken with them about your research feel free to mention this".

Constructed examples, written by us, not real applicant statements:

Weak: "Professor [Surname] has accepted me into her lab and loved my project."

Revised: "I have been in contact with Professor [Surname], who has agreed to support my application. Her group's current work on [topic] is where my question about [specific problem] fits: I would extend the [method] I used in my final-year project to [the group's dataset or system]."

The weak version claims an admission that only the program can give, and reports a reaction you cannot verify. The revised version states the contact accurately, then spends its words on the fit, which is what the reader is assessing. Never paste the professor's email into the statement, and never upgrade "please apply" into "agreed to supervise". For how many names to give and how to write the professor paragraph, see whether to name a professor in your SOP.

If the yes disappears

Professors go on leave, lose a grant or take a different student. If that happens:

  1. Ask the professor directly whether the position is still open, once.
  2. Ask the graduate coordinator. McGill's central guidance says the Graduate Program Coordinator answers questions about "the procedure for finding a supervisor within the department."
  3. Keep the application alive where you can. At UofT MIE, students under review "can contact MIE Faculty members directly to inquire about potential supervision." At Queen's Psychology, an application no faculty member takes is marked "withdrawn, no supervisor available", so a second name on the form matters.
  4. Go back to your list. Re-read emailing a supervisor for a master's in Canada and contact the next fit, with one new fact in the email: your application is already submitted.

Questions after a supervisor says yes

Does a supervisor's yes mean I am admitted?

No. At UofT MIE, after the supervisor confirms, "the student will be notified of next steps including submission of official final transcripts", and only then does the decision follow. The program still makes the offer.

Should I tell the other professors I emailed?

Our recommendation: yes, briefly, once you have a written yes and have decided to accept it. A one-line thank-you that says you have found a supervisor closes the thread and keeps the relationship.

Can I still apply to other programs?

None of the pages we checked says a supervisor's yes binds you to that program, and an offer from another program may come first. Be honest with the professor if you accept an offer elsewhere. For the study permit letter after an offer, the PG diploma SOP sample shows the paragraph structure an officer reads.

After the offer arrives, use the Canada PhD study permit letter sample to keep the supervisor's name and funding consistent across your permit file.

Get a free review of your letter of intent

Get a free Quick Review of your letter of intent against GradPilot's adviser-fit rubric, the closest public rubric for the paragraph that connects your question to your supervisor's work. It reads whether that connection names a specific person, lab or area and is backed by checkable details. For the rest of a master's letter, use the general MS statement of purpose rubric.

More guides for Canadian applicants:

Sources

Retrieved October 31, 2026, except where noted.

Get feedback on your letter of intent

Paste your draft. The free Quick Review shows what to fix against the programme's rubric before you submit.

Review it free

Rubrics for This Topic

All PhD rubrics

Related Articles

Check your letter of intent before you submit

A free Quick Review against an admissions rubric. Sign up, paste your draft, see what to fix.

Get the free review
No credit card required