Canadian Health Care Interview Questions: MMI
Canadian MMI questions on the Canada Health Act, private clinics and Indigenous health: the Act's five criteria, TRC Calls 18-24, constructed answers.
Canadian Health Care Interview Questions: MMI
Two texts answer the Canadian health-policy interview questions on this page: the Canada Health Act's five criteria (public administration, comprehensiveness, universality, portability, accessibility) and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's health Calls to Action, numbers 18 to 24. Call 24 is addressed to medical schools by name.
A US-style answer about "insurance" misses how the Canadian system is built: the Act sets conditions a provincial plan must meet to receive the full federal cash contribution, and provinces run the plans. An Indigenous health answer that names no specific Call to Action, and no school requirement, is generic. This page gives you the exact text, two constructed answers, and a way to build your own.
The Canada Health Act text below was read on the Justice Laws site, which says the "Act current to 2026-10-19". The TRC Calls to Action and every school page were checked on November 7, 2026.
Why Canadian schools ask about this
Four school pages tie these topics to selection.
- McMaster lists "Awareness of Social Health Issues in Canada" among the issues its MMI stations "may include".
- Ottawa's panel evaluates "critical thinking/ethics" among its listed characteristics.
- Calgary lists an "Indigenous Foundational Knowledge Requirement" among the items its application must receive.
- Saskatchewan requires "an approved Indigenous studies prerequisite course or certificate" by the application deadline. From the 2027 application cycle (admission in 2028), it says two certificate courses "will no longer fulfill the Indigenous Studies prerequisite".
For how each school runs its interview, see the Canadian medical school interview formats table.
The Canada Health Act in plain words
Section 3 states the goal: "to protect, promote and restore the physical and mental well-being of residents of Canada and to facilitate reasonable access to health services without financial or other barriers."
Section 7 sets the test. A province's "health care insurance plan" must satisfy "the criteria described in sections 8 to 12" for the province to "qualify for a full cash contribution".
| Criterion | What the Act requires of the provincial plan | What it does not say |
|---|---|---|
| Public administration (s. 8) | "administered and operated on a non-profit basis by a public authority" | It is written about the insurance plan. It does not say who owns a clinic or hospital |
| Comprehensiveness (s. 9) | "must insure all insured health services provided by hospitals, medical practitioners or dentists" | It does not list drugs, dental care or other services outside that definition |
| Universality (s. 10) | "one hundred per cent of the insured persons of the province" covered "on uniform terms and conditions" | It does not set the benefit level |
| Portability (s. 11) | no "minimum period of residence in the province, or waiting period, in excess of three months" | It does not end all differences between provinces |
| Accessibility (s. 12) | "reasonable access" not impeded "whether by charges made to insured persons or otherwise" | It sets no wait-time target |
Two more sections matter for private-care questions. Section 18 bars payments for insured services "that have been subject to extra-billing". Section 19 says "user charges must not be permitted". Section 20 says that where a province does not comply, an amount "shall be deducted from the cash contribution".
Our view: in any Canadian private-care station, name the mechanism before you take a side. The Act is a funding condition on provincial plans. The hard line in its text is charging insured patients for insured services. Who delivers the care is a separate question the criteria do not settle. The countercase: provinces have their own health insurance laws, and we have not checked any of them here. If the interviewer asks about a specific province, say what you do and do not know.
Two-tier care, private clinics and wait times
Our constructed wordings: "Should Canada allow private surgical clinics?" or "Is two-tier health care fair?". Use this procedure:
- Define the case. Is the clinic paid by the public plan, or does the patient pay for an insured service? The Act treats these differently (sections 18 to 20).
- Name who is affected. Patients waiting, patients who could pay, patients who could not, the staff both settings draw on, and the province paying for care.
- Give the strongest case on each side. Faster access for some patients against the accessibility and universality criteria.
- Take a position and say what would change it. For example: evidence on whether wait times fall for everyone or only for those who pay.
- Stay inside what you know. Do not quote wait-time numbers you cannot source.
Constructed answer: should Canada allow private surgical clinics?
Constructed example, written by us, not a real applicant answer. Context (invented): a six-minute MMI station.
"The first thing I would want to know is who pays. If a province contracts a private clinic and the patient pays nothing for an insured surgery, the Canada Health Act's criteria are about the insurance plan, not about who owns the operating room. If patients pay for an insured service, sections 18 and 19 on extra-billing and user charges apply, and the province loses part of its federal contribution. So my answer depends on the model. I would support publicly paid clinics if they shorten waits without pulling nurses and anesthesiologists away from public hospitals. That is the evidence I would want to see. I would not support letting people buy faster access to an insured surgery, because accessibility in the Act means access is not impeded by charges to patients. The people most affected by that choice are the ones who cannot pay."
What this answer does: it uses the Act's own sections, separates the two models, takes a position on each, and names the evidence that would change its mind. A weaker answer would say "Canada has free health care, so private clinics are wrong", which the Act's text does not support.
Indigenous health and the TRC Calls to Action
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action has a section headed "Health" with seven calls, numbers 18 to 24. They are quoted below from the TRC document, which uses the term "Aboriginal".
- Call 18 asks governments "to acknowledge that the current state of Aboriginal health in Canada is a direct result of previous Canadian government policies, including residential schools".
- Call 19 asks the federal government, "in consultation with Aboriginal peoples, to establish measurable goals to identify and close the gaps in health outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal communities".
- Call 20 asks it to "recognize, respect, and address the distinct health needs of the Métis, Inuit, and off-reserve Aboriginal peoples."
- Call 21 asks for "sustainable funding for existing and new Aboriginal healing centres".
- Call 22 asks "those who can effect change within the Canadian health-care system to recognize the value of Aboriginal healing practices and use them in the treatment of Aboriginal patients in collaboration with Aboriginal healers and Elders where requested by Aboriginal patients."
- Call 23 asks all levels of government to "Increase the number of Aboriginal professionals working in the health-care field", "Ensure the retention of Aboriginal health-care providers in Aboriginal communities" and "Provide cultural competency training for all health-care professionals."
- Call 24 reads in full: "We call upon medical and nursing schools in Canada to require all students to take a course dealing with Aboriginal health issues, including the history and legacy of residential schools, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Treaties and Aboriginal rights, and Indigenous teachings and practices. This will require skills-based training in intercultural competency, conflict resolution, human rights, and anti-racism."
How to use this in an answer:
- Name the Call and what it asks. "Call 24 asks medical schools to require a course" is specific. "Reconciliation is important" is not.
- Speak for yourself, not for communities. Say what you have learned, from which course or source, and what you will do as a student. Do not describe what Indigenous patients or communities think or want; you were not asked to speak for them.
- Connect it to the school's own requirement where one exists: Calgary's Indigenous Foundational Knowledge Requirement or Saskatchewan's Indigenous studies prerequisite.
- Say what you do not know. An honest limit is stronger than a confident generalization.
Constructed answer: what does Call to Action 24 mean for you as a medical student?
Constructed example, written by us, not a real applicant answer. Context (invented): the applicant completed a university Indigenous studies course and is answering a five-minute station.
The weak version:
"Reconciliation is very important to me and I believe all doctors should be culturally sensitive. I would always treat every patient the same and with respect."
It names no Call, no source and no action. Treating every patient "the same" also sits awkwardly with Call 20, which asks the federal government to address the "distinct health needs" of Métis, Inuit and off-reserve Aboriginal peoples.
The revised version:
"Call to Action 24 asks medical schools to require a course on Aboriginal health issues, including the history and legacy of residential schools, Treaties and Aboriginal rights, and skills-based training in anti-racism. My Indigenous studies course covered residential schools, but not Treaties in any depth, so that is where I have the most to learn. As a student I would take that course seriously as clinical training, not as a box to tick. I would also take Call 22 at its word: healing practices are used where Aboriginal patients request them, which means asking the patient rather than assuming. I cannot speak for any community, but I can be the student who has done the reading and asks before acting."
What changed: the revision quotes what Call 24 asks, names a gap in the applicant's own learning, links a second Call to a concrete behaviour, and does not speak for anyone else.
A prep checklist for health-policy stations
- Learn the five criteria in section 7 by name, and what sections 18 and 19 forbid.
- Read Calls 18 to 24 in the TRC document, and be able to say what Call 24 asks of medical schools.
- Check whether your schools state an Indigenous studies requirement (Calgary and Saskatchewan do) or list "social health issues" among station topics (McMaster does).
- For each policy question, practice the five-step procedure above aloud, in under six minutes.
- Cut every number you cannot source. A clear argument without a statistic beats a wrong statistic.
For general station practice, see MMI ethics scenarios and our McMaster MMI guide. The Canadian interview dates and formats table and the Toronto MPI guide cover how each school runs its interview.
Questions about Canadian health care interview questions
What are the five principles of the Canada Health Act?
The Act calls them criteria: public administration, comprehensiveness, universality, portability and accessibility. Section 7 lists them, and sections 8 to 12 define each.
Does the Canada Health Act ban private clinics?
The Act's text does not say who owns a clinic. It sets conditions on the provincial insurance plan, and sections 18 and 19 bar extra-billing and user charges for insured services, with deductions under section 20.
Which TRC Calls to Action are about health?
Calls 18 to 24, under the heading "Health". Call 24 is addressed to "medical and nursing schools in Canada".
Should I talk about Indigenous health if I am not Indigenous?
Yes, if asked, and speak from what you have learned and what you will do. Do not speak on behalf of Indigenous patients or communities.
Do I need statistics for a Canadian health policy question?
No. The Act's sections and the TRC's text give you specific, checkable content. Use a number only if you can name its source.
Review the writing you send next
Get a free Quick Review of your ABS entry descriptions if an interview season ends without an offer and your next document is the OMSAS autobiographical sketch. GradPilot's OMSAS ABS rubric checks that each entry makes your part identifiable and supports its central claim with evidence suited to its category, and the OMSAS ABS examples show the point-form style.
More on the medical school essays hub, including the Casper test examples for the typed and video test that McMaster, Queen's, Dalhousie, Saskatchewan and Memorial list.
Sources
Retrieved November 7, 2026.
- Government of Canada, Justice Laws, Canada Health Act, page 1 and page 2 ("Act current to 2026-10-19"): sections 3, 7 to 12, 18 to 20.
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, Calls to Action (2015): Calls 18 to 24 under "Health".
- McMaster University UGME, After You Apply (2027 entry): MMI station issues.
- University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Application process (2027 admission cycle): characteristics the panel evaluates.
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Application timeline (2025-2026 cycle): Indigenous Foundational Knowledge Requirement.
- University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, How to apply (2026 and 2027 cycles): Indigenous studies prerequisite and the 2027-cycle change.
Chosen your next application?
Get feedback on your own SOP, personal statement or application essays. Choose your program and review option.