If you're applying to graduate school, you've probably wondered: does it matter if my recommender uses Gmail? What about letterhead—is that required?

Short answer: it depends on the program. Some schools flat-out ban personal email addresses. Others allow Gmail but will look at the letter more closely. And letterhead? It's usually expected, though rarely an absolute requirement.

We dug through official policies from dozens of graduate programs to give you the real picture.

The email domain question

Most grad programs now use online portals where you enter your recommender's email, and the system sends them a secure link. What email they use matters more than you might think.

Programs that don't accept Gmail at all

Some schools are strict. If your recommender only has a personal email, you'll need to find someone else—or risk your application being incomplete.

Boston University (Arts & Sciences PhD/MFA) asks: "Can I list my recommender's personal email address?" Their answer: "No." They state:

"We do not accept recommendation letters sent from a Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, etc. account" because they must be able to trace the email back to a university, company, or organization. (Boston University)

University of Toronto (GPLLM) says:

"Do not enter non-institutional email addresses for your referees (i.e. gmail, yahoo, hotmail, etc…). Reference letters submitted via a non-institutional email address are not admissible and the application will be considered incomplete." (Jackman Law)

University of Colorado Boulder (Computer Science) notes that recommendation letters submitted from personal email addresses "are not accepted" and that they require an official or verifiable work email. (University of Colorado Boulder)

University of Nebraska Medical Center requires letters "must be sent from an institutional email address, be on official university/company letterhead and be signed." (UNMC)

Programs that allow Gmail but flag it

Many top programs don't outright ban personal emails, but they'll look harder at those letters.

Duke University Graduate School is probably the clearest about this:

"We ask that you provide professional email addresses for your recommenders if possible. Recommendations sent to a general email account (Gmail or Yahoo, for example) will be more closely monitored in our application credentials review process." (Duke Graduate School)

Harvard Graduate School of Design says letters submitted via personal addresses "may face additional scrutiny" and that they strongly prefer institutional email. If personal email must be used, they emphasize that letterhead becomes "even more important." (Harvard GSD)

MIT (HASTS PhD) tells applicants to use institutional or corporate email, warning that submissions from "Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo" "may be subject to additional review."

Dartmouth (Guarini School) notes that "letters of recommendation from personal email accounts will be subject to additional review." (Dartmouth Graduate Studies)

Columbia Nursing says recommenders with personal addresses "may be subject to review" to verify they're legitimate. (Columbia School of Nursing)

Programs that accept personal email with verification

Some schools explicitly accommodate recommenders without institutional email—retired professors, startup founders, independent consultants—but they'll verify.

Columbia SIPA explains that recommenders "may use a personal email address," but "upon acceptance, there will be a verification process" to confirm the recommender is authentic. (Columbia SIPA)

University of Maryland (ECE) says if a recommender doesn't have institutional email, they may use personal email, but "they should use official University letterhead when writing their recommendations." (UMD ECE)

What about letterhead?

Letterhead isn't about looking fancy. It's a verification tool—a way to confirm that the person writing the letter actually works where they claim to work.

When letterhead is required

Some programs—especially in health professions—are explicit that letterhead is mandatory.

Penn Career Services (for medical school letters): "Letters of recommendation must be signed, dated, and on official letterhead." (Penn Career Services)

Dartmouth Graduate Admissions says letters "should be on official letterhead," and if the company or institution "does not have or allow letterhead," the recommender should explicitly note that in the letter. (Dartmouth)

Rutgers Health Professions Office requires all letters be "on the author's letterhead or contain the author's contact information, and be signed by the author." (Rutgers HPO)

When letterhead is strongly recommended

Many writing centers and career offices advise using letterhead even when not strictly required.

UNC Writing Center advises that "when possible, write recommendations on official letterhead," explaining that this "adds to your credibility as a recommender." (UNC Writing Center)

UC Riverside's Graduate Student Resource Center notes that letters "usually shouldn't be submitted on a plain piece of paper" and suggests using letterhead to look more professional. (UCR Graduate Center)

How letterhead and email work together

Some schools explicitly link these two signals:

• Harvard GSD says letterhead is "even more important if your recommender is using an unofficial email address."
• UMD ECE permits personal email only if official letterhead is used.
• Dartmouth requires letterhead and warns that letters from personal email get extra review.

The logic is simple: if one authenticity signal is weak (personal email), you need the other one (letterhead) to be strong.

Why do schools care so much?

Letters of recommendation carry serious weight in admissions decisions. A Council of Graduate Schools study on holistic review found that letters were rated important by about 68% of master's committees and 67% of doctoral committees for final admission decisions.

Because letters matter so much, admissions offices care about:

1. Is the recommender who they say they are?
2. Did the recommender actually write this letter?
3. Is the recommendation candid and confidential?

Email domain and letterhead are tools to establish authenticity. An institutional email can be verified against a faculty directory. Letterhead confirms institutional affiliation. Together, they reduce the chance that someone fabricated a letter.

We've written more about LOR ethics and what universities actually do to verify letters—including how some schools use third-party vendors to call recommenders directly.

Verification is real

This isn't hypothetical. Schools do check.

Yale GSAS states: "It is the policy of the graduate school to verify all credentials submitted in support of an application. All transcripts, recommendations, publications, standardized test scores, and supplemental materials may be traced to their sources in order to confirm their authenticity." (Yale GSAS)

Columbia GSAS has contracted with Re Vera, a third-party verification company, "to assist with the verification of letters of recommendation."

Ohio State explicitly reserves "the right to contact your recommender directly to confirm authenticity of the submitted materials." (Ohio State)

The Council of Graduate Schools advises admissions committees: "If the admissions committee is not familiar with the recommender or is not sure of the credibility of the recommender, a call to that person might be helpful."

What to do: practical advice

Here's how to handle the email and letterhead question:

Check each program's specific policy. Don't assume. Some schools (like BU, Colorado CS, Ontario Tech) will mark your application incomplete if a letter comes from Gmail. Others are more flexible.

Prefer recommenders with institutional email when you have a choice. Between two equally strong recommenders, the one with a .edu or company email removes one potential friction point.

If your best recommender only has Gmail:

• Verify the program allows it
• Ask them to use official letterhead
• Make sure their contact info is complete and verifiable (title, affiliation, phone)
• Some programs suggest the recommender explain why they're using personal email ("I'm retired and no longer have university email access")

For letterhead:

• If the letter is a PDF upload, letterhead is expected where possible
• If it's a text box in a portal, letterhead obviously doesn't apply
• If letterhead isn't available (small company, retired professor), the recommender should include complete contact information and ideally note the situation

Priority order for choosing recommenders:

1. Strong letter + institutional email + letterhead = ideal
2. Strong letter + institutional email, no letterhead = usually fine
3. Strong letter + personal email + letterhead + verifiable identity = acceptable where allowed
4. Strong letter + personal email + no letterhead = risky for competitive programs

A lukewarm letter on perfect letterhead from a .edu domain is worse than a detailed, enthusiastic letter from someone using Gmail—as long as the program allows it and the recommender can be authenticated.

The bottom line

Most programs don't formally require institutional email or letterhead. But both significantly reduce friction and scrutiny. They signal that your recommender is who they claim to be and that they took the letter seriously.

For students aiming at top MS or PhD programs: default to institutional email and letterhead wherever possible. Use Gmail only when you genuinely have no alternative and the program explicitly permits it.

And if you're not sure about a specific program's policy? Check their FAQ. Or email admissions. A two-minute question now is better than a flag on your application later.

---

Planning your graduate school applications? GradPilot helps you craft authentic application materials—from statements of purpose to preparing the context your recommenders need. We use Pangram Labs to ensure everything stays in your voice.