Skip to main content
Law

What Reviewers Look For in the OLSAS Law — Optional / Part B Essay

This review looks at whether your essay clearly explains the specific context, experience, background, barrier, identity, future direction, or other purpose you chose to address. It checks that readers can understand the relevant facts, your place in them, and the effect or current relevance without relying on other parts of your application. It also focuses on answering the current prompt directly and using limited space for the information that matters.

4 scored dimensionsScore range: 05

What We Check

1
Why This Optional Essay Belongs

Whether the response identifies the additional context, intellectual experience, future direction, background, identity, barrier, circumstance, or other job it has chosen to supply.

2
Facts and Your Position

Whether the response supplies enough visible facts to understand the chosen subject and the applicant's position inside it.

3
Effect, Meaning, or Current Relevance

The relationship the prompt asks the applicant to explain: how a circumstance affected a record, how an experience shaped judgment, why a future direction follows, or why an identity or community connection is relevant.

4
Every Prompt Part in Limited Space

Whether the response completes every countable job in the supplied current prompt and remains understandable without an unseen application field.

Mistakes We Flag

Opening with uncertainty or apology
Starting by saying you were unsure whether to include the essay delays the information the reader needs. Begin with the context or purpose of your response instead.
Combining unrelated leftovers
An optional essay can lose focus when it gathers achievements, explanations, and interests that did not fit elsewhere. Choose one connected subject that serves the prompt.
Using a label instead of an explanation
A category such as first-generation student or access applicant does not by itself explain your relevant experience or circumstances. Give the setting, relationship, condition, responsibility, or other facts that make the context clear.
Forcing a hardship into a growth story
You do not need to claim that a barrier made you stronger, or turn a neutral circumstance into personal fault. State its specific effect, your response, or why it is relevant now.
Relying on another application section
Readers should not have to find your main statement, sketch, or a link to understand your point. Include the needed facts and connections in this response.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to disclose hardship or an unusual identity for an optional essay?

No. The essay can provide additional context, an intellectual experience, future direction, background, identity, barrier, circumstance, or another relevant purpose. It does not need to justify itself through hardship severity, unusual identity, or exceptional achievement.

Do I have to explain how an experience made me stronger?

No. You do not owe a redemption arc, gratitude claim, benefit claim, remorse statement, or complete resolution. Explain the effect, meaning, or current relevance the prompt asks for.

Can I address more than one optional topic in the same response?

If the prompt presents alternative topics, answer the one you choose rather than piling several options together. If the prompt asks for multiple connected actions, make sure each requested part is answered.

How long can this essay be?

Current school-specific optional, Part B, and access-category limits can range from 1,000 to 2,500 characters including spaces. Follow the current official limit for the school and prompt you are answering; no minimum length is required when you complete the prompt's needed tasks.

Get your essay scored across all 4 dimension with specific, actionable feedback. Two free reviews per day — no credit card required.

See how law school personal statement review works