Law application review · current public rubrics
Law school personal statement review built on public rubrics
Check your personal statement, perspective statement, addendum, why-school essay, or OLSAS statement against a public rubric — with your own school's prompt and limits pasted above your draft. Every review is of your own writing, with an AI-authenticity check. Your first Full Review costs $5.
Personal statement · Perspective statement · Addenda · OLSAS · First Full Review: $5
First Full Review
typically ready in about 2–3 minutes
$5
Included
- Scores for the selected rubricSee how the draft performs across the criteria for that application—not a generic writing score.
- Critiques tied to your exact textEach critique points back to the sentence or passage that created the issue.
- Specific revision suggestionsMove from “something feels off” to a prioritized list of changes for the next draft.
- Optional AI-detection contextSee clear, lightly assisted, or flagged signals with sentence-level context when available. Treat detection as a signal, not proof.
- A review you can shareInvite an advisor, mentor, or trusted reader to respond to the same critiques and evidence.
Law admissions feedback
What the law statement review checks
Law readers move fast through open-ended statements. The review checks whether your draft makes its case with specific evidence and a clear line to legal study — without requiring any one topic, arc, or disclosure.
A specific center, not a resume in prose
The statement builds around experiences you can show, not a list of titles or a childhood-certainty cliché.
Your school's prompt sets the standard
Paste the school's current prompt and limits above your draft — the review scores against what your school actually asks, including multi-part prompts.
Addenda stay factual and specific
GPA, LSAT, gap, and character-and-fitness addenda are scored for clarity and coverage of what the question asks — never for remorse performances or extra disclosure.
Perspective without a required arc
Perspective statements are scored the same whether your school's prompt is experience-framed or category-framed — and no hardship story is ever required.
6 public law rubrics
Pick the rubric that matches your document
Six JD rubrics: the personal statement, the post-SFFA perspective statement, application addenda (explanatory and character-and-fitness), the why-school essay, and the two Ontario OLSAS statements. Applying for an LL.M.? The LL.M. personal statement has its own rubric in the law library.
Law School — Personal Statement
Review your own law-school personal statement against the current school prompt, with narrative, reflection, prompt-fit, and AI-authenticity checks.
Inspect the complete public rubricA Personal Center
Whether the statement selects one bounded applicant-centered subject and establishes why that subject belongs in this response.
Experience in Action
Whether the statement shows the applicant encountering, choosing, testing, observing, or changing something rather than relying on role labels or conclusions.
What You Make of It
Whether the statement interprets its evidence by showing an earlier assumption, a complication, and a resulting change in judgment, question, or conduct.
Why Law When the Prompt Asks
A law-motivation claim only when the supplied current prompt asks for one or the response voluntarily presents one as positive evidence.
Every Part of the Prompt
Whether the statement completes the countable jobs in the supplied current official prompt without relying on an unseen application field.
Compliance-first review
Built to respect your school's rules
Absence is not permission
Schools set their own authorship and AI rules and they do not agree. Our policy pages quote each one as published. Cornell, Penn, NYU, Stanford, Chicago and Northwestern published no J.D. rule on record when we checked on 2026-09-01, and a school that publishes no rule has not granted permission. Columbia's AI certification sits inside the application form — read it there. The certification you sign is the sentence that applies.
Georgetown: feedback on drafts is expected — the writing is yours
Georgetown’s J.D. FAQ says “While you can (and should) receive and incorporate feedback on drafts…” and that “the only person who may be engaged in the actual writing is you.” Checked 2026-09-01.
Duke and Michigan: no generative AI, proofreading and feedback allowed
Duke’s J.D. application page states that “All writing samples must be your own work” and that “you wrote all drafts and the final product without the assistance of generative artificial intelligence,” and adds that this “does not preclude asking family members, friends, pre-law advisors, and others for proofreading assistance or general feedback.” Michigan writes that applicants “ought not use generative artificial intelligence tools as part of their drafting process” and that they “may, similarly, ask pre-law advisors, mentors, friends, or others for basic proofreading assistance and general feedback and critiques.” Checked 2026-09-01.
UCLA and UVA: no AI tools — read the sentence before you decide
UCLA publishes “The use of any artificial intelligence tools to assist in the completion of this application is prohibited.” UVA’s J.D. admissions FAQ publishes “The statement should be written in your own voice without the help of artificial intelligence tools.” Both checked 2026-09-01. Where a school says that, this page will not tell you to work around it.
Your own writing, reviewed — never rewritten
Feedback identifies issues and points to exact passages. It never drafts replacement language, so your certification that the work is yours stays true. The AI-authenticity check is a signal, not proof — a reason to re-read your own sentences, never evidence about who wrote them.
A $5 first review in a $3,000+ market
Published law admissions packages we checked on 2026-09-01 run from about $3,000 to about $9,000. Your first Full Review costs $5 and is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes.
US and Ontario in one place
The OLSAS statements have their own rubrics built for character limits and Ontario school structures — not re-skinned US advice.
Compare your options
What a law school personal statement review costs in 2026
A rubric review is fast revision signal against your school's actual ask. A consultant or pre-law advisor may be better for school-list strategy and application planning. The price bands below are published rates we checked on 2026-09-01; confirm the current figure on the provider's own page.
GradPilot law review
Fast revision priorities for a statement or addendum, scored against your school's pasted prompt.
Choose the closest public rubric and receive scores, feedback pointing to the words you wrote, and specific revision suggestions, typically in about 2–3 minutes. Your first Full Review costs $5 and Pro includes ten Full Reviews for $50; two free Quick Reviews are available each day. The review reads the draft you wrote and never writes or rewrites a sentence for you.
A free reader you already have
A pre-law advisor, a friend, a family member, or a peer essay swap.
Free, and several law schools name exactly these readers in their own rules: Duke and Michigan both put pre-law advisors, mentors, friends and others in writing as permitted sources of proofreading and general feedback. Turnaround depends on the person, and you get a human read rather than scores against a rubric.
A marketplace single-essay edit
One round of line edits from a freelance editor.
Published rates we checked on 2026-09-01 run about $20 to $45 for a single-essay edit or a cheaper second reading, often returned within 24 hours to a few days. Credentials and scope vary widely, and at least one such service says on its own page that it combines human editors with AI — ask before you buy.
A test-prep single edit or a consultant's essay workshop
One tracked-changes pass, or a live working session on one document.
Published rates we checked on 2026-09-01 are $150 for a single-essay edit with a written assessment, and about $150 to $250 for an essay workshop or an hour with a former admissions officer. Turnaround is days, or a scheduled meeting.
A consultant's written evaluation or unlimited editing
A detailed written critique of one statement, or unlimited rounds on it.
Published rates we checked on 2026-09-01 are $895 for a written evaluation and critique of one personal statement returned in four to five days, and about $1,450 to $1,500 for unlimited editing of one essay across a full drafting cycle. Hourly rates around $275 are also published.
A full application package
School list, every written document, and coaching across the cycle.
Published packages we checked on 2026-09-01 run from about $3,000 to about $9,000 depending on how many applications are covered, with core documents typically finished in eight to ten weeks. Credentials, scope, turnaround, and price vary. Worth it when you want a person involved across the whole application rather than feedback on one draft.
How it works
From your school's prompt to a clearer statement
- 01
Choose the law application document
Select the public rubric that most closely matches the prompt, application system, and document format.
- 02
Paste the complete personal statement
Include the full draft so the review can assess the content, structure, repetition, and fit together.
- 03
Get detailed feedback
A Full Review is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes with scores, critiques tied to specific passages, and revision suggestions.
- 04
Revise, compare, and share
Review another substantive draft or invite a mentor, advisor, or trusted reader to respond to the same feedback.
Application sources
Always follow your school's current instructions
Prompts, limits, and assistance policies vary by school and change by cycle. Paste your school's current wording above your draft. Where a school restricts AI tools, that published sentence and the certification you sign are what apply to the document — the call is yours.
Law application resources
Know your school's rules, then review your draft
Questions
Law school statement review questions
What is included in a law school personal statement review?+−
A Full Review scores your draft against the selected public rubric — evidence, structure, prompt coverage, and economy — with critiques tied to exact passages and specific revision suggestions. It never drafts language for you.
Which rubric should I choose?+−
Pick the rubric that matches your document: personal statement, perspective statement, addendum, why-school essay, or the OLSAS statements for Ontario. Paste your school's current prompt and limits above your draft — they are what the scoring follows.
How quickly will I receive feedback?+−
A Full Review is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes. Processing time can vary with document length and demand.
How much does a review cost?+−
You can run two free Quick Reviews each day. Your first Full Review costs $5; Pro includes ten Full Reviews for $50.
Can I review a revised draft again?+−
Yes — that's the point. The review is rubric-aware: the same criteria are applied every run, so scores don't swing and a second run tells you whether the revision helped. Scores help you compare drafts rather than predict admission, so read the supporting feedback alongside each number.
Does the review include AI detection?+−
AI detection is available as optional context. It is treated as a signal rather than proof, with sentence-level context when available. The application-specific feedback does not depend on treating a detector as an authority.
Do you offer a discount for LSAC fee-waiver recipients?+−
There is no separate fee-waiver program. The published offer is the same for everyone: two free Quick Reviews a day, and your first Full Review costs $5. Pro includes ten Full Reviews for $50 if you are reviewing several documents across a school list.
Is a review allowed at my school?+−
It depends on the school, and the sentence it publishes is the answer. Georgetown says you can and should receive feedback on drafts as long as the writing is yours; Duke and Michigan prohibit generative AI in drafting while allowing proofreading and general feedback from advisors, mentors, and friends; UCLA prohibits AI tools across the application, and UVA’s sentence bars AI tools on the personal statement. Read the rules quoted above and the full set on our law school AI policies page, then decide. Absence of a published rule is not permission, and the certification you sign is the sentence that applies.
Does the review use AI to give feedback?+−
Yes. The review reads writing you already wrote and scores it against a public rubric; it is never a writer or a rewriter, and it never produces replacement prose for your statement. Whether you may use it is decided by your school's own rule and the certification you sign — where a school prohibits AI tools on the application, do not use a review on that document.
Make the statement specific to your case
Your first Full Review costs $5 and is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes. Two free Quick Reviews are available each day.