Law application review · current public rubrics
Law school personal statement review built on public rubrics
Check your personal statement, perspective statement, addendum, why-school essay, or OLSAS statement against a public rubric — with your own school's prompt and limits pasted above your draft. Every review is of your own writing, with an AI-authenticity check. Your first Full Review costs $5.
Personal statement · Perspective statement · Addenda · OLSAS · First Full Review: $5
First Full Review
typically ready in about 2–3 minutes
$5
Included
- Scores for the selected rubricSee how the draft performs across the criteria for that application—not a generic writing score.
- Critiques tied to your exact textEach critique points back to the sentence or passage that created the issue.
- Specific revision suggestionsMove from “something feels off” to a prioritized list of changes for the next draft.
- AI detection powered by Pangram LabsSee clear, lightly assisted, or flagged signals with sentence-level context when available. Treat detection as a signal, not proof.
- A review you can shareInvite an advisor, mentor, or trusted reader to respond to the same critiques and evidence.
Featured & cited in
Research & education references
Law admissions feedback
What the law statement review checks
Law readers move fast through open-ended statements. The review checks whether your draft makes its case with specific evidence and a clear line to legal study — without requiring any one topic, arc, or disclosure.
A specific center, not a resume in prose
The statement builds around experiences you can show, not a list of titles or a childhood-certainty cliché.
Your school's prompt sets the standard
Paste the school's current prompt and limits above your draft — the review scores against what your school actually asks, including multi-part prompts.
Addenda stay factual and specific
GPA, LSAT, gap, and character-and-fitness addenda are scored for clarity and coverage of what the question asks — never for remorse performances or extra disclosure.
Perspective without a required arc
Perspective statements are scored the same whether your school's prompt is experience-framed or category-framed — and no hardship story is ever required.
6 public law rubrics
Pick the rubric that matches your document
Six JD rubrics: the personal statement, the post-SFFA perspective statement, application addenda (explanatory and character-and-fitness), the why-school essay, and the two Ontario OLSAS statements. Applying for an LL.M.? The LL.M. personal statement has its own rubric in the law library.
Law School — Personal Statement
Review your own law-school personal statement against the current school prompt, with narrative, reflection, prompt-fit, and AI-authenticity checks.
This rubric looks for a focused, applicant-centered narrative that shows what you did, observed, or questioned and how it shaped your thinking. It also checks that your reasoning is clear, your claims are supported by the experiences you describe, and your response answers the school’s current prompt. If a prompt asks why law, that connection should grow specifically from your experience rather than rely on broad statements about justice or a lifelong calling.
For applicants writing a personal statement for a U.S. law-school application.
Inspect the complete public rubricA Personal Center
Whether the statement selects one bounded applicant-centered subject and establishes why that subject belongs in this response.
Experience in Action
Whether the statement shows the applicant encountering, choosing, testing, observing, or changing something rather than relying on role labels or conclusions.
What You Make of It
Whether the statement interprets its evidence by showing an earlier assumption, a complication, and a resulting change in judgment, question, or conduct.
Why Law When the Prompt Asks
A law-motivation claim only when the supplied current prompt asks for one or the response voluntarily presents one as positive evidence.
Every Part of the Prompt
Whether the statement completes the countable jobs in the supplied current official prompt without relying on an unseen application field.
Compliance-first review
Built to respect your school's rules
Absence is not permission
Schools set their own authorship and AI rules and they do not agree. Our policy pages quote each one as published. Cornell, Penn, NYU, Stanford, Chicago and Northwestern published no J.D. rule on record when we checked on 2026-09-01, and a school that publishes no rule has not granted permission. Columbia's AI certification sits inside the application form — read it there. The certification you sign is the sentence that applies.
Georgetown: feedback on drafts is expected — the writing is yours
Georgetown’s J.D. FAQ says “While you can (and should) receive and incorporate feedback on drafts…” and that “the only person who may be engaged in the actual writing is you.” Checked 2026-09-01.
Duke and Michigan: no generative AI, proofreading and feedback allowed
Duke’s J.D. application page states that “All writing samples must be your own work” and that “you wrote all drafts and the final product without the assistance of generative artificial intelligence,” and adds that this “does not preclude asking family members, friends, pre-law advisors, and others for proofreading assistance or general feedback.” Michigan writes that applicants “ought not use generative artificial intelligence tools as part of their drafting process” and that they “may, similarly, ask pre-law advisors, mentors, friends, or others for basic proofreading assistance and general feedback and critiques.” Checked 2026-09-01.
UCLA and UVA: no AI tools — read the sentence before you decide
UCLA publishes “The use of any artificial intelligence tools to assist in the completion of this application is prohibited.” UVA’s J.D. admissions FAQ publishes “The statement should be written in your own voice without the help of artificial intelligence tools.” Both checked 2026-09-01. Where a school says that, this page will not tell you to work around it.
Your own writing, reviewed — never rewritten
Feedback identifies issues and points to exact passages. It never drafts replacement language, so your certification that the work is yours stays true. The AI-authenticity check is a signal, not proof — a reason to re-read your own sentences, never evidence about who wrote them.
A $5 first review in a $3,000+ market
Published law admissions packages we checked on 2026-09-01 run from about $3,000 to about $9,000. Your first Full Review costs $5 and is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes.
US and Ontario in one place
The OLSAS statements have their own rubrics built for character limits and Ontario school structures — not re-skinned US advice.
What the rubrics flag
Mistakes the public law rubrics flag before an admissions reader does
Each flag below comes from the published profile of one of the 4 public law rubrics this review uses. The review points to the sentence that triggers it; you decide what true detail belongs in the revision.
Turning the essay into a resume
Listing roles, awards, and activities can leave the reader without one experience or question to follow. Give sustained attention to the subject that changed your reasoning, and use other details only when they add needed context.
Law School — Personal Statement rubricRelying on a label alone
Naming an identity or category without explaining the setting, relationship, responsibility, or recurring condition behind it leaves readers without the context of your perspective.
Law School — Perspective Statement rubricRelying on a generic reason for law
Saying law has always been your calling does not show the current question, experience, or responsibility behind your interest. If you discuss legal study, connect it to something visible in your own experience.
OLSAS Law — Personal Statement rubricOpening with uncertainty or apology
Starting by saying you were unsure whether to include the essay delays the information the reader needs. Begin with the context or purpose of your response instead.
OLSAS Law — Optional / Part B Essay rubricUsing a title instead of an action
A role such as president, captain, or paralegal does not show what you actually did. Describe a decision, interaction, observation, or unresolved question from that role.
Law School — Personal Statement rubricUsing hardship as the whole argument
A difficult experience does not need to prove that you deserve admission. Explain your position and the meaning of the experience without treating pain as something to rank.
Law School — Perspective Statement rubricTurning the statement into an activity list
Titles, dates, awards, and role names do not explain what you did, decided, observed, or learned. Develop the experiences that changed your understanding or responsibility.
OLSAS Law — Personal Statement rubricCombining unrelated leftovers
An optional essay can lose focus when it gathers achievements, explanations, and interests that did not fit elsewhere. Choose one connected subject that serves the prompt.
OLSAS Law — Optional / Part B Essay rubricFormat at a glance
Limits and review areas: public law rubrics
Limits and review areas below come from 4 of the public law rubrics; the rest are listed above. Paste the complete draft for the rubric closest to your prompt; a Full Review is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes.
- Law School — Personal Statement600–900 words · 5 review areas
- Law School — Perspective Statement350–750 words · 4 review areas
- OLSAS Law — Personal Statement5 review areas
- OLSAS Law — Optional / Part B Essay4 review areas
Application sources
Always follow your school's current instructions
Prompts, limits, and assistance policies vary by school and change by cycle. Paste your school's current wording above your draft. Where a school restricts AI tools, that published sentence and the certification you sign are what apply to the document — the call is yours.
Law application resources
Know your school's rules, then review your draft
Questions
Law school statement review questions
Do I need a dramatic hardship, courtroom experience, or leadership role?
Law School — Personal Statement rubric
No. A routine interaction, work task, family responsibility, class, hobby, community experience, text, relationship, or question can provide the basis for the statement. What matters is showing your own encounter, choices, observations, and thinking.
Do I need to write about a protected identity, trauma, or adversity?
Law School — Perspective Statement rubric
No. You may discuss an experience, community, background, identity, responsibility, or recurring context. No protected identity, adversity, discrimination, travel, unusual biography, or category label is required.
Do I need to explain why I want to study law?
OLSAS Law — Personal Statement rubric
Only if the school’s prompt asks for it or you choose to include it. When you do include it, make the reason specific to your own experience, question, responsibility, or goal.
Do I need to disclose hardship or an unusual identity for an optional essay?
OLSAS Law — Optional / Part B Essay rubric
No. The essay can provide additional context, an intellectual experience, future direction, background, identity, barrier, circumstance, or another relevant purpose. It does not need to justify itself through hardship severity, unusual identity, or exceptional achievement.
What is included in a law school personal statement review?
A Full Review scores your draft against the selected public rubric — evidence, structure, prompt coverage, and economy — with critiques tied to exact passages and specific revision suggestions. It never drafts language for you.
Which rubric should I choose?
Pick the rubric that matches your document: personal statement, perspective statement, addendum, why-school essay, or the OLSAS statements for Ontario. Paste your school's current prompt and limits above your draft — they are what the scoring follows.
How much does a review cost?
You can run two free Quick Reviews each day. Your first Full Review costs $5; Pro includes ten Full Reviews for $50.
Do you offer a discount for LSAC fee-waiver recipients?
There is no separate fee-waiver program. The published offer is the same for everyone: two free Quick Reviews a day, and your first Full Review costs $5. Pro includes ten Full Reviews for $50 if you are reviewing several documents across a school list.
Is a review allowed at my school?
It depends on the school, and the sentence it publishes is the answer. Georgetown says you can and should receive feedback on drafts as long as the writing is yours; Duke and Michigan prohibit generative AI in drafting while allowing proofreading and general feedback from advisors, mentors, and friends; UCLA prohibits AI tools across the application, and UVA’s sentence bars AI tools on the personal statement. Read the rules quoted above and the full set on our law school AI policies page, then decide. Absence of a published rule is not permission, and the certification you sign is the sentence that applies.
Does the review use AI to give feedback?
Yes. The review reads writing you already wrote and scores it against a public rubric; it is never a writer or a rewriter, and it never produces replacement prose for your statement. Whether you may use it is decided by your school's own rule and the certification you sign — where a school prohibits AI tools on the application, do not use a review on that document.
Make the statement specific to your case
Your first Full Review costs $5 and is typically ready in about 2–3 minutes. Two free Quick Reviews are available each day.