Law School AI Policies: What You Can (and Can't) Use AI For

The complete guide to AI policies for law school applications in 2026. LSAC guidance, school-by-school rules, and practical advice for pre-law applicants.

89
Law Schools Tracked
37
With Explicit AI Policy
52
Defer to LSAC

The Bottom Line

The AI policy landscape for law school applications is fragmented. LSAC has not issued a blanket prohibition, leaving each school to set its own rules. Of the 89 law schools we track, 37 have an explicit AI policy at the institution or law-school level. The rest (52 schools) have no stated AI policy for admissions and effectively defer to LSAC and general academic integrity standards. Among schools with explicit policies, the trend is toward restriction: most prohibit AI-generated content while a handful permit brainstorming and proofreading only.

What LSAC Says About AI

All ABA-accredited law schools use the LSAC Credential Assembly Service (CAS) for applications.

LSAC CASLaw School Admission Council (LSAC)

LSAC has not issued a blanket prohibition on AI use in law school applications. In a 2023 blog post, LSAC acknowledged that banning ChatGPT from personal statements would be "challenging to enforce and justify." Instead, LSAC positions the proctored LSAT Writing sample as the primary mechanism for verifying an applicant's authentic writing ability. LSAC evaluated AI detection tools but found them insufficiently reliable for high-stakes admissions use. Individual law schools set their own policies on AI use in application essays through the CAS platform.

Personal statements written without such assistance tend to feel more authentic, and this authenticity could influence admissions decisions.

View sourceVerified 2026-02-18

How to Read These Policies

We classify each school's AI policy across three independent dimensions. Learn more about our methodology.

L = Permission Level

  • L0 No explicit policy
  • L2 Line-level editing allowed
  • L3 Brainstorming only
  • L4 AI use prohibited

D = Disclosure

  • D0 No disclosure required
  • D1 Optional disclosure
  • D2 Must disclose AI use
  • D3 Must attest no AI used

E = Enforcement

  • E0 No enforcement stated
  • E1 Manual review possible
  • E2 Uses screening tools
  • E3 Formal verification

School-by-School Policies

AI policies for 89 law schools in our database. Each school name links to its full policy detail page.

Arizona State University

Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

LSAC CAS
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Law-specific:L1D0E0AI use permitted
Baylor University

Baylor Law School (JD)

LSAC CAS
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Law-specific:L4D0E0AI use prohibited
Institution:L2D0E0Line-level editing allowed
Institution:L2D0E1Line-level editing allowed
Institution:L4D3E2AI use prohibited
Institution:L4D3E1AI use prohibited
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Columbia University

Columbia Law School (JD, LLM, JSD)

LSAC CAS
Institution:L2D0E0Line-level editing allowed
Law-specific:L4D3E2AI use prohibited
Institution:L3D0E1Brainstorming only
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Duke University

Duke Law School (JD)

LSAC CAS
Institution:L1D0E0AI use permitted
Law-specific:L4D3E0AI use prohibited
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Institution:L2D0E1Line-level editing allowed
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Institution:L2D0E1Line-level editing allowed
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Institution:L0D0E0No explicit policy
Georgetown University

Law School (J.D. Admissions)

LSAC CAS
Institution:L4D3E2AI use prohibited
Law-specific:L3D0E1Brainstorming only

Schools With Notable Law AI Policies

These schools have clear, public guidance on AI use in law school application essays.

L4AI use prohibited

submitting plagiarized essays or...the substantive content or output of an artificial intelligence platform, technology, or algorithm

  • Institution-wide L4 policy prohibits submitting "substantive content or output of an artificial intelligence platform"
  • Applies across undergraduate, graduate, and professional schools including HLS
  • Requires applicants to attest that work is solely their own (D3)
Georgetown University

Law School (J.D. Admissions)

L3Brainstorming only

the only person who may be engaged in the actual writing is you

  • Law school FAQ states: "the only person who may be engaged in the actual writing is you"
  • Explicitly names AI alongside "friends, family members, advisors" as prohibited writers
  • Permits AI for feedback and brainstorming, but not for generating any text (L3)
L3Brainstorming only

Submitting the substantive content or output of an artificial intelligence platform, technology, or algorithm constitutes application fraud.

  • Institution-level policy calls AI-generated content "application fraud"
  • Permits grammar/spelling checks and early-stage topic brainstorming
  • Consequences include admission revocation or expulsion

Practical Guide: Using AI in Your Law School Application

Section-by-section guidance on what's allowed and what's not, based on school policies and LSAC guidance.

Personal Statement (LSAC CAS)

Your personal statement is the centerpiece of your law school application. Most law schools ask for a two-page narrative that reveals your voice, reasoning ability, and motivation for pursuing law. Admissions committees read thousands of these essays and can often detect AI-generated prose by its generic tone and lack of specific personal detail.

What you can do

  • Use AI to brainstorm essay topics or organize your thoughts before writing
  • Ask AI to check grammar, spelling, and punctuation after you have a complete draft
  • Use AI to identify unclear sentences or awkward phrasing in your own writing
  • Run your draft through AI for a "reader perspective" on structure and flow

What you should avoid

  • Have AI generate your essay draft, outline, or any paragraphs
  • Copy-paste AI-generated text into your personal statement
  • Ask AI to "improve," "rewrite," or "polish" entire sections of your essay
  • Use AI to generate a personal narrative or anecdotes you did not experience

Diversity Statements

Many law schools invite an optional diversity statement. This essay asks you to reflect on how your background, identity, or experiences will contribute to the intellectual life of the law school. Because it is deeply personal, authenticity is paramount.

What you can do

  • Use AI to understand what diversity statements typically cover
  • Ask AI for feedback on whether your draft addresses the prompt clearly
  • Use AI to proofread for grammar and spelling after you have written your draft

What you should avoid

  • Have AI draft a diversity statement for you — admissions readers expect a deeply personal voice
  • Use AI to fabricate or embellish experiences related to diversity
  • Ask AI to "make this more compelling" — it will strip away your authentic voice

"Why X School" Essays

School-specific supplemental essays ask why you want to attend a particular law school. Because these are tailored to each school, generic AI responses are especially easy to spot and particularly damaging.

What you can do

  • Use AI to research a school's clinics, journals, faculty, and programs
  • Ask AI to proofread your draft for typos before submission
  • Use AI to verify you are answering the actual prompt

What you should avoid

  • Use AI to draft "Why this school?" essays — they will sound generic
  • Reuse AI-generated supplemental content across different schools
  • Have AI summarize a school's programs for you to paste into your essay

Character & Fitness Addenda

Character and fitness disclosures (academic misconduct, criminal history, etc.) require careful factual accuracy and appropriate tone. Misstatements in these addenda can follow you to bar admission. This is one area where AI assistance carries particular risk.

What you can do

  • Use AI to check that your addendum is clear, concise, and factually consistent
  • Ask AI about general best practices for structuring a C&F addendum
  • Use AI to proofread for grammar after you have written your disclosure

What you should avoid

  • Have AI draft your C&F addendum — inaccurate or fabricated details can be grounds for bar denial
  • Use AI to minimize, reframe, or spin the facts of a disclosure
  • Rely on AI for legal advice about what must be disclosed

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use ChatGPT for my law school personal statement?
It depends on the school. LSAC itself has not banned AI, but many individual law schools have. Schools like Harvard, Georgetown, Columbia, Duke, and UCLA prohibit or heavily restrict AI use in application essays. A handful of schools (such as ASU Law) explicitly welcome responsible AI use. If your target school has no stated policy, the safest approach is to limit AI to brainstorming and proofreading — and never let it draft, outline, or write your statement. Admissions readers value authenticity, and AI-generated prose tends to sound generic.
Does LSAC check for AI in applications?
LSAC evaluated AI detection tools but found them insufficiently reliable for high-stakes admissions decisions. Instead, LSAC positions the proctored LSAT Writing sample as the primary mechanism for verifying authentic writing ability. Law schools can compare your LSAT Writing sample to your personal statement to check for consistency in voice and quality. Some individual law schools also use their own screening tools or manual review processes.
Which law schools ban AI completely?
Several top law schools prohibit AI use in application essays. Schools classified as L4 (AI prohibited) for their law programs include Harvard, Columbia, Duke, UCLA, UC Berkeley, UMich, USC Gould, UVA, Buffalo, Richmond, and Baylor. Georgetown Law (L3) allows feedback and brainstorming only but prohibits AI from doing any actual writing. The majority of law schools, however, have no explicit AI policy and defer to LSAC and general academic integrity standards.
Should I disclose AI use on my law school application?
There is no universal disclosure requirement across LSAC CAS. However, some schools require applicants to certify that their written materials are their own original work. If a school asks about AI use directly, answer honestly. Using AI in violation of a school's policy and failing to disclose it could constitute a character and fitness issue — something that follows you all the way to bar admission. When in doubt, disclose.
Can I use AI for the LSAT?
No. LSAC strictly prohibits any external assistance, including AI tools, during the LSAT and LSAT Writing. The LSAT is a proctored exam with strict security protocols. Using AI during the test would constitute cheating and could result in score cancellation, reporting to law schools, and potential bar admission consequences. LSAC does position the proctored LSAT Writing sample as a way for schools to verify your authentic writing voice.
What happens if a law school detects AI in my application?
Consequences vary by school but can be severe. Schools may reject your application, rescind an offer of admission, or dismiss you after enrollment. More importantly, submitting AI-generated work while certifying it as your own could raise character and fitness concerns during bar admission — a process where every law graduate must demonstrate honesty and integrity. The practical risk is also high: AI-generated personal statements tend to sound generic and hurt your chances of standing out in a competitive applicant pool.